| Table of contents Royal Reception for the President of the Peoples Republic of China Money is more important than human rights? Announced "Global Partnership" in London and Beijing Where will take the coach of the British Empire?
Why - Britain and suddenly German «Drang nach Osten» - «The onslaught of the East"? So, first of all, yes - to the East. Secondly, yes - the onslaught. Third, all this looks like something in a German force style, but not in the UK - the cat. Here the Germans decided once - "the East" and go, do not hesitate. However, they came back from the East, beaten. But it went well. But Britons are usually like "shy" and do not show openly their underlying intentions. Only the gentlemen's rules is "working" smoothly until last week, when in London, not only to the hair roots have felt that the interests of their business - urgent, but also showed how much it is urgent. The cry: "Me in Beijing on the case immediately!" Sounded the whole fair world so clearly that even prim London tops in a hurry did not even ask, "What will tell Maria A.", in other words - the world public opinion, in the face of, for example, the views of the US leadership. The rate of change of the political format was terrific. In the style of "What to expect? - Shake it! " Yes, the situation for London at the beginning of this XXI Century, but by and large - the Third Millennium, is that, having passed the Hong Kong Chinese comrades at the turn of 2000, the Britons lost their foothold in the East, without which they are now just confused: China is growing; to the east - following the sun - migrating from the United States a new world power centers. A Britain with their hands (!) - Gentlemen, you know - has handed China some 15 years ago, a Hong Kong! And, in fact, this was the "fulcrum" in the East, by which London, guided by the precepts of the old man of Archimedes could "turn the eastern world." There was ... disappeared from under his feet. What is the failure of the British strategy! Probably not weak separation Queen arranged their politicians for the "puncture"! And now Her Majesty has to personally - personally (!) - To correct this strategic mistake, to the point to give the night at Buckingham Palace the leader of China. Otherwise - in the future - this error is strategically myopic subjects of Her Majesty (which in English does not seem at all - they are masters build a long combination) could be for the Crown fatal. Just look affectionately greeted Elizabeth II, the head of the very country that the British unrolled almost "in the dust" in the "Opium War» XIX century. And, in fact, China of that era, according to some estimates, gave, almost without 30% of world GDP, supplying European ladies silks, which were not found lice, and the spices, which saved the royal palaces of thedifferent kinds of strong odors ... About the "Opium Wars" against the British Empire, the Qing Empire preserved volumes of documents. And most of them are easy to understand - the cartoons reveal even dull, thatmade Britons in China, when destroying its direct competitor. Yes, it is China that was a direct competitor of British manufactories rising early XIX century in European markets. And London decided to "remove a competitor," through the imposition of the Chinese population of all drugs "charms heroin intoxication." This competition for European markets was then called the "Opium War":
The outcome of the drama are impressive:
And now, after 150 years, Britain again was aimed at China, which is rapidly increasing its share of world GDP and has started the last two decades to throw the same Europe is not incense, and clothing and all kinds of appliances - from TV stations and PCs to iPhones and cars. And again, like 150 years ago, Britain did not hesitate to show a keen interest in China, but she is not currently forces and capabilities send upon China next filth as "Opium War 2.0", which means that sophisticated Anglo-Saxons will be looking for a way to return its influence in those places. Note UK the first European "Krupnyakov" rushed into the ranks of the new international bank, which has created the spring of this year, China - ABII (Asian bank infrastructure investments - Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank). It was only later, after prudent Britons, already went to 57 countries in the world, including France and Germany. The United States refused to join, and for them there is no way to ABII. But first some of the European powers in the ranks of the founders of the new World Bank was rushed to the Anglo-Saxons! And the swiftness in the affairs of the bank - usuallyunhurried - clearly demonstrated a very significant commitment to return the British influence on the Pacific coast. The response to this has been painful from Washington. Least… As told an anonymous former employee of the US administration, relations between the US and Britain have been hit hard in March 2015, when the Obama administration has chided Britain for "permanent fixture" to China. This came after Britain first of the "Big Seven" has joined the Chinese Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, which China has created as an analogue to the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank. "The fact that we were disappointed - it's a zero consultations on this matter with the United States, Britain did not notify us, the knowledge of the rest of the Group of Seven," - said [1] American. And that States have taken offense? They themselves have already shown all the direction - "the Pacific Ocean!" That Britain and went "in the steppe." Yes, the US has long realized that there - in the Pacific - formed future world powers. And because the former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton back in 2009 published a famous article entitled "America's Pacific Century," in the journal "States Foreign Policy" - "Pacific Century America [2]," which, presumably read and London. Something was written in English ... Royal Reception for the President of the Peoples Republic of ChinaWe have read and understand that the environment of the Queen of Great Britain, this is the historical moment overslept. How many prime ministers with the foreign ministries chefs changed over the last 15 years? And, in fact, not one raised the question of the fact that instead of Hong Kong returned to Chinese Britons ought to be something for myself to look at those that are far from Albion, the banks. In general, the performers did not work ... and Her Majesty had to deal with this matter personally! As a result of these efforts, President of China for the first time in 10 years set foot still on the ground in Britain, from which China had suffered so much in the old days. For example, no one in China has not forgotten how angered Beijing meeting British Prime Minister Cameron with the Dalai Lama spiritual leader of Tibet, seeking to separate from China. China then froze relations with British officials more than a year.
But Britons to "erase memory", immediately filed a comrade Xi royal carriage in which, as they say, no foreign heads of state did not go through London. Therefore he Royal Reception hosted by the President of the Peoples Republic of China as an equal Monarch UK - and it is a nod to the British head of the Middle Kingdom, and apologize for the fact that recently "came to the pet peeve." It is also - and an obvious allusion to the local artists whose mistakes should be corrected personally the Queen. In a democracy, you know, overworked ... We have, as you remember, there is a saying: "let bygones ...", well, etc. And, here in China, we used to speak politely , but keep the historical memory firmly . Somehow, they say, Deng Xiaoping asked: "How would you rate the 200th anniversary of the French Revolution?", Which was celebrated in 1989. And you know what said Chinese political guru? He said: "More is not enough for many years have passed since then, to make any serious conclusions." 200 years - no time for the Chinese estimates ?! What! By the way, indirectly supported Xi Dan, abandoning the words of the Parliament [3] on "who's ancient power": "Yes, you have to have the Parliament of the XIII century. But we started to talk about the rule of law and the rights of people 4,000 (four thousand) years ago and began to codify all 2,000 (two thousand) years ago. So let's remember who's ancientpower. " And - Britons tolerated. And - "The Queen loved it!" (C) Mikhail Bulgakov. "The Master and Margarita"). Thus, the arrival on these days, Xi Jinping in Britain had profound implications. Which, however, the show was not present, although it breaks through deliberately polite words hosts and guests. Although Comrade Xi Prime Minister Cameron even tried to call "frank conversation" over a glass of "good British ale":
No, you know, to invite the distinguished guest at the pub - it is, of course, a high degree of respect. And Xi Jinping, feel about the situation, he said [4] that "in recent years, Sino-British relations have been on the path of rapid development." Location was suitable for the application . Halftone , you know ... And maybe the government just nervous when Buckingham Palace took over the functions of the ministers who receive a salary? Well, how else to interpret the reaction of the British Foreign Secretary, Philip Hammond, who, for no apparent reason began to refute [3] charges in the British press that the UK is going on about China, "like a panting puppy?" You could have to miss this shot, but - do not miss. Nerves, sir ... Immediately he said that Britain enters into a closer relationship with China, "with his eyes open." The same kind of ambiguity - many also remember the film of Stanley Kubrick "Eyes Wide Shut". Then Hammond showed awareness povergnuvshuyu shock fans of arithmetic. London hopes to sign with China trade and investment contracts worth more than 30 billion pounds, said the Finance Minister. According to his words [3], the deal with China will help create in the UK nearly four thousand new jobs. And now divide the 30 billion pounds to 4,000 jobs and answer the simple question: "What they are golden, these jobs?" However, there is some explanation for this. Once upon a time it was written an article entitled "Dizzy with success". Today, on the occasion of the arrival of Comrade Xi, Prime Minister David Cameron announced [5] that the visit of the Chinese leader has brought more than 30 billion pounds (46 billion dollars). Well, if such money one beer, apparently, will not get off ... Although outwardly political correctness flowed like oil. We have already mentioned that Xi Jinping (before visiting the pub) has filed a golden royal coach, where he arrived at the palace. Here's how it happened:
Money is more important than human rights?The new policy of the British Crown against China emerged so quickly, stunned even the battered press Fleet Street. Cynically and openly wrote about this "dash to the East," the British newspaper «The Guardian» in the article «China is rising as the US declines. Can not ignore Britain this reality [6]"-" China is on the rise, while the United States is in decline. Britain can not ignore this reality. " How is a classic? - "In time to bring - it is not to betray. It is - to foresee. " And some Britons "anticipate" the master - the strategy of building a century ahead. Although, here at Hong Kong slashed. But quickly found nedorabotochku, so now catching up in China of Stakhanov pace. "Who would have thought just three years ago, the government of David Cameron will be the author of the bold changes in foreign policy in Britain since the Second World War? But this is what is happening now - wrote «The Guardian». - This process began this year when the British government announced that it will join the Chinese initiative to finance huge infrastructure needs in Asia. The United Kingdom was the first country outside of Asia, which has become a party to the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (ABII) ... Statement by Cameron that the UK could become "the best partner of China in the West" was not empty ranting, as well as the idea of the "golden age" Sino-British relations. " As one man about identical "licked up the glands ..." And then - extravaganza! «The Guardian» continues his revelation: "... We are not satisfied with the human rights situation in China, which is, by our standards, is poor, and in many ways ... But the human rights situation - it is not the reason (!) In order to refuse to establish closer ties with China »(sic!). Well, just - to a point. I remember one expert noted witty on "human rights": "You know this man. His name - the Anglo-Saxons. " This phenomenal flexibility ("Learn, student!") English on the theme "human rights violations in China," quickly found its explanation. As the English proverb: «No matter what they say, it's all about money». - "Whatever people may say, they always talk about money." And, here, the visit of Xi Jinping was also associated with a bo-o-Olsha money. Even the British press wrote "We sell [7]", referring to the fact that the Chinese comrades arrived at Foggy Albin projects by 46 billion dollars. What sort of "human rights in China" - what are you? Money is at stake, money, Karl! "The new turn towards China gives Britain an opportunity to upgrade its infrastructure, which otherwise would be impossible (!). It will create many new jobs. And above all, it shows how Britain can prosper in an oriented to Asia and revolving around the world of China, which is formed in front of our eyes, "- concludes« The Guardian »your comment in anticipation of the Chinese infusion. For that same Britons have in mind, "Welcome, Mr. C," or "Welcome, 46 billion?" And "who is a mother of Britain is valuable?" A? So frankly delyacheskoe "cooperation" has caused a storm of discussion among journalists and experts from major British magazines, who consider the conclusion of such contracts "traditional Asian bow" in the direction of a strong partner. Well, let them discuss. And here - only a few agreements in financial and economic areas which, according to Chinese news agency "Xinhua", concluded during the four-day visit of Comrade Xi to Albion. - The Chinese company has allocated [8] 2 billion pounds (about 3.1 billion US dollars) for the construction of power plants in the UK, working on fuel from biomass. Chinese construction company «SinoFortone Group» has announced the signing of a contract with the British company «Orthios Eco Parks Limited» («Orthios»), which is developing the combined production of food and electricity. These developments will be used in two environmentally friendly power plants, the construction of which is expected in Holyhead and Port Talbot in Wales. Heat power station with capacity of 299 megawatts of electricity will be produced from imported vegetable waste. - Bank of China officially started [9] its operations center in London, and held simultaneously in Beijing, London and Singapore ceremony global publishing index transactions yuanevymi bonds. This index is officially published for global investors. In the future, the Bank of China will strengthen the globally integrated network operating centers in Beijing, Shanghai, Hong Kong, London and New York, will significantly increase the potential for continuous operations within 24 hours 5 days a week. - «British Petroleum» concluded [5] a contract with «China Huadian Corp.» contract for the supply of liquefied natural gas. As reported by Bloomberg, for 20 years, BP will supply LNG to China at $ 10 billion. BP LNG supplies from several countries, including the project «Tangguh» in Indonesia, where the British company owns 37% stake. The company also has 17% of the project «Browse» in Western Australia. Before China out - reach. - Since 2016 the UK will issue [10] multiple two-year visas for Chinese tourists. The new visa policy is seen as another step the United Kingdom, aimed at attracting Chinese tourists whose lavish spending supports local employment and economic growth. Chinese tourists annually generate 500 million pounds into the British economy, spending £ 2688 on average per capita for each visit. «Money, Money, Money ...» Yes, the representative of Downing Street said [3] that the bilateral negotiations will not "taboo". So, then - even more interesting. While there is no evidence, but the plans - on the table. The press got superproject who have all chances to be signed between China and Britain. What are we talking about? "Two major Chinese industrial groups will take part in the construction of nuclear power plants" Hinkley Point "in the south-west of England and two nuclear power stations in the counties of Suffolk and Essex," says the press: "Cameron to sign deal for Chinese nuclear reactor in Essex [ 11] »and« Bradwell nuclear site being 'handed' to China, says GMB [12]. " It would seem - a normal energy cooperation. No matter how true! Take the above - Britain, relying on the power of China, may "infringe on the sacred" and break the solidarity approach within the European Union to the EU energy strategy. Explain the strategy London newspaper «The Sunday Times»: «No State of the EU should not change its energy system without consultation, because it could have" enormous implications "for the system of another Member State." The meaning of "EU Strategy" as he viewed recent years - as far as possible to limit the role and presence of Russia with its energy projects - from gas to nuclear power - in the territories of the EU. This presence is seen by European "partners" in Moscow, as a "factor of global risk." And they are in the EU in connection with this undertaking? They build a "fence" - cut off from the Russian energy resources in the EU. But energy-something Europe needs. Is not it so? And now, in the midst of this frenzy Russophobic, Britain enters into an agreement with China in the field of nuclear energy "Hinkley Point 'worth 37 billion dollars. At the same time, Chinese companies get there share of 33.5%. There is another British-Chinese project of a similar kind. What is the breakthrough of the Chinese nuclear exports to the EU market through the UK. And where is the respect for the views of the EU? Yes, even "British Petroleum" (BP) and China's CNPC oil leader announced the creation of a strategic alliance. British and Chinese oil and gas giants are going to work together on oil production in southern Iraq, developing a huge deposit room. In addition, members of the alliance will be engaged in global trade of oil and LNG, to cooperate in emissions trading CO2, and to share technology. Announced "Global Partnership" in London and BeijingDescribed above - this is what is already known. It can be assumed that the list of agreements and contracts on the visit will be much longer, but said the main thing: Britain's Queen Elizabeth II and President Xi Jinping ushered in a period of "global partnership" between the two countries. This historic "global partnership" in the XXI century, the participants of "Opium Wars" the XIX-th century, said at the dinner table in a welcoming toast. A banquet was given at Buckingham Palace, a detailed account of what TASS correspondent [13] in London. Next - the details and receive quotations from his story.
The guests of the banquet began to 170 people, including family members of the crowned Windsor. At the same time, Catherine Duchess of Cambridge wore a red dress in honor, according to London-colored national flag of China.
So the United Kingdom has demonstrated it in the face of the whole (!) Windsor dynasty "moves to the side of China." And Xi Jinping on the steps of Buckingham Palace stepped out of the carriage ... The heads of the British monarchy. All the all clear?
"The time is ..."? It seems that in this case, Hamlet was not right - it is now "link of times in London and China relations" recovered. And I somehow one of them, do not envy ... The dinner was also attended by British Prime Minister David Cameron and the Minister of Finance George Osborne. Responsible for the implementation of the decisions of the Crown determined. Royal cook regaled guests fillet Khingan halibut (royal food!) And balmoralskoy venison (Balmoral - the name of the Queen's residence in Scotland, near Aberdeen). Queen in his address called President Hu's visit to the United Kingdom as "a milestone in an unprecedented year of cooperation and friendship between Britain and China", stressing that both countries are ready to take their relationship to a new level. "Mr. President, - said the Queen, turning to Xi Jinping, - the relationship between the United Kingdom and China today, in fact, is a global partnership. We have every reason to celebrate the dynamic growth of economic relations between our countries, as well as progress in our joint activities aimed at to deal with urgent international challenges. " "We were shocked the energy and enthusiasm with which the Chinese leaders are leading the country to a new and ambitious future for the Chinese people - admitted Elizabeth II. - Economic recovery and development have changed the lives of people throughout China and have saved hundreds of millions of people from poverty. This is a huge historical achievement with far-reaching positive impact on people's lives. " Queen Elizabeth II also noted that the chosen model of China - "one country, two systems" - "opened the way for the handover of Hong Kong to China." Her Majesty could not "in their hearts" does not mention this fact to the UK leaving the shores of the Pacific ... Moreover, the national anthem of the Kingdom includes the very words: "Rule Britannia, the waves!" «When Britain first, at Heaven's command Arose from out the azure main; This was the charter of the land, And guardian angels sang this strain: «Rule, Britannia! Rule the waves: Britons never will be slaves ». The nations, not so blest as thee, Must, in their turns, to tyrants fall; While thou shalt flourish great and free, The dread and envy of them all. «Rule, Britannia! Rule the waves: Britons never will be slaves ». This - the anthem of the monarchy, which is sung about the "blessed by God" in Britain, whose inhabitants "will never be slaves." Slaves were residents of other countries who were in the sphere of interests of the British Empire. Today, the scope of these interests has returned to China. However, in different historical epochs ... Even something as uncomfortable remind dear readers well-known main postulate of the British state, formulated Russophobe Palmerston, who declared as: "How hard it is to live in the world, with Russia when no one is at war." Remember? John Temple Henry, 3rd Viscount Palmerston of [14]: «Therefore I say that it is a narrow policy to suppose that this country or that is to be marked out as the eternal allyor the perpetual enemy of England. We have no eternal We allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual , and those interests it is our duty to follow ». This Henry John Temple, Lord Palmerston, the English statesman, for many years the minister of defense, chief of the Foreign Ministry, the Prime Minister at the Royal Court of the British Empire said at the time: "This is why I say that short-sighted to consider this or that country the same ally or eternal enemy England. We do not have constant allies, we have no perpetual enemies. Only our interests are eternal and unchangeable, and it is our duty - to follow them. " (Speech in the House of Commons on March 1, 1848) And now - in 2015. Britain brilliantly affirms its commitment to the historic mission - "The interests of Britain's unchanging and eternal» - «Our interests are eternal and perpetual»!And, on the other hand, that there is in London can still come up in the XXI century? Do not lag behind the Britons from a life with its own traditions? In response toast Xi Jinping was correct and said that "Britain and China, each for their part, represent the great Eastern and Western civilization." True, they "are geographically far apart," but the two countries "have long and close cooperation." A hint of XIX century? Oh, these "Oriental subtlety ..." "As the old Chinese saying - Chinese President continued, bringing the conversation to the plane Meaningful folklore -" Ability can appear only once, so use it until it slipped away. "In the UK, you also have a proverb: "A wise person makes changes in happiness." And at a time when our comprehensive strategic partnership this year went to the second decade, let's use this opportunity to work together in order to usher in an even better future for the Sino-British relations. " XIX century "set aside" - "partnership" is not 20 years? Everything - from scratch? No. Speaking in Parliament, Xi Jinping mentioned [15] that he was "deeply impressed by the vitality of the Sino-British relations and deep friendship between our peoples." So, interesting statements sound interesting timeframe stated ... Yes, "the Lord millstones grind slowly, but inexorably." The Chinese know that they are doing and why. And 20 years for them - not even 200 years old. Read the legacy of Deng Xiaoping. A visit to the background ...Watching the chic reception in London and going to the pub Cameron and Xi Jinping, some observers have expressed a desire to go beyond the specific dates and look in any international circumstances he passed. Research on the topic "What was the background of the world of Chinese visit to Britain?" Held [16] blogger Vladimir Vinnikov. And here's what he found details of the international situation surrounding the visit: - October 5, in Atlanta (USA), 12 States in the Pacific, including the United States and Japan, which account for about 40% of global GDP, have signed an agreement on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TTP, Trans-Pacific Partnership). - Immediately after that, in a number of EU countries, especially in Germany, have been mass protests against the signing of a similar agreement on Trans-Atlantic partnership, (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership - TTIP). - 8 October, China launched its own international system of payments Chinese International Payment System (CIPS), an alternative SWIFT. - 9 October in Lima (Peru) took the next summit of the IMF and the World Bank, on which the United States again refused to reform these international financial institutions. - During the first three quarters of 2015 Chinese yuan came in first place among the currencies used in commercial calculations in the ASEAN region. - In 2015, China and India continue to be the largest consumers of physical gold, collectively providing more than 80% of the global demand for "yellow metal". No comments. This - not a collection "under the topic", and - the real events surrounding the visit of Xi Jinping to the UK. And to reflect on the agreements held in London. But Americans have choked! In front of them Britons made a breakthrough to a departing from the platform in the future composition of shouting: "Grab your suitcase, station moves!" "As long as the leader of the Communist Party of China basks in the attention of the royal family and residents of London, and the pages of the British and Chinese press did not go the news about the latest breakthroughs in relations between Britain and China, on the other side of the Atlantic talk of" betraying the interests of the Western world, "he lamented most independent presses in the world. Britain has chosen the wrong path in their China initiatives notes [1], former Obama adviser on Asia, Evan Medeiros: "If you give in to Chinese demands, this leads to a further strengthening of Chinese pressure. London started a dangerous game, tactically adjusting to China, relying on the economic benefits, which can then lead to a large number of issues of strategic character. " While the US is trying to strike a balance between pushing China to constructive relations and blame China's "human rights", a cyber-espionage and issues of the South China Sea, David Cameron and Finance Minister George Osborne accused of being "sold for Chinese investment and strengthening trade. " British Foreign Ministry also rejected accusations that he had "betrayed their principles for the sake of trade", arguing that the dialogue on "Human Rights" with China is underway. "Right before the arrival of Xi Jinping in the US last month, Obama announced [1] that he is preparing sanctions against China over cyber attacks. His harsh statements contrast with the British side bows before the visit of the Chinese leader. The British were arguing among themselves, whether entered British-Chinese relations in a "golden decade" or the "golden era"? And in Britain, not everyone was thrilled. Well, they call it "the opposition of Her Majesty", so read these articles interesting, but the sense from them a zero - who is there, in Fleet Street, going against the monarchy? That is the British «Financial Times» published a harsh article [1] "The United States took a tough stance on the convergence of England with China", which directly accused the UK in the delivery of the interests of the Western bloc: "Who would have thought that the bone of contention between the metropolis and the former colony would be country dragon, which a hundred years ago the Western powers divided like a pie? " Honestly. But this is - the last day of British politics. Do not keep up with the trend, you know, "lagging behind" ... The article calling for Britain to be cautious in relation to "the Chinese bearing gifts." Too late! Cameron has opened his arms to tens of billions of Chinese investment. And let them, investments from China, local press prudently writes, the Chinese have always followed the principle of Mao - "seize the village to take the city", that is, enter the critical sectors indirectly through other sectors. The decision has already been made - Chinese investment to be! Where will take the coach of the British Empire?If someone dear readers somehow decides that the author shows some "jealousy Moscow" to the Anglo-Chinese rapprochement, I can reassure him. We're just looking, that is happening, and marvel at the depth and rapidity of these changes. Epoch is replaced, you know ... And as some of our findings, they are. First. China acts in the national interest, and wants to get it is too late, the European markets - Britain, though, even a country. To do this, with the help of, among others, Russia, planned a huge project "New Silk Road" from the Pacific Ocean to the shores of the English Channel. And his jerk on Albion Chinese leadership simply "ties up" the British that they - "the West" - will at least not to interfere, and, as a maximum, to contribute to this project to create a single market in Eurasia, where all have enough space. Everyone! Also some very inadequate, representatives of other continents ... Second. Britons again want to outwit all, and be headed by the process: "In England no permanent allies and no permanent enemies. England has only permanent interests. " Let's see what they are allowed to take "control" of the Pacific leaders of China, taking into account the long memory of the Chinese establishment, first of all, on the issue of the victims of "Opium Wars". Third. Interesting position expressed by key international conflicts, which may contribute to their resolution. Billions of work wonders! According to [17] of the London talks, held in the country residence of British prime minister, were devoted to international issues. In particular, the sides "discussed the importance of finding a resolution of the Syrian conflict, and concurred that the international community must work together more effectively to combat LIH." "As for Ukraine, the Prime Minister and the Chairman welcomed the progress in the implementation of the agreements Minsk", - said the prime minister's office. Cameron and Xi Jinping discussed a wide range of regional security issues and expressed a unanimous opinion that the "extremely necessary to avoid instability on the Korean peninsula." "The leaders also agreed that the timely and open dialogue between Britain and China could open up opportunities for major diplomatic solutions in a wide range of global and regional security challenges," - the report says. And finally, the fourth. Impact concluded [18] from the blogger who calls himself "Evening political leader", "China makes a bid for a major export infrastructure: high-speed railways, reactors, tunnels and bridges. In the next five years, that China and the world will live in 2016-2020 gg., The amount of financing of exports will be a fantastic $ 398 billion. It is expected to increase pressure on the fronts of the PRC infrastructure markets, and especially nuclear. October 23, 2015 the era of Big Game (Big Game) Britain in Asia over. For Asia it is time Big Gain (Great Benefits). " Feel? Suddenly? Prematurely? But Xi's on his way to the Royal carriage of the British Empire:
And Britain's Queen personally escorted the Chinese leader on the steps of Buckingham Palace gesture «Farewell». Yes, you is ever seen?
PS On the question of the most important for China to end the visit. Representatives of the International Monetary Fund "hint" to the Chinese authorities that soon the renminbi will be included in the basket of reserve currencies, reported [19] by Bloomberg in the midst of the visit. Currently, the "basket" includes the US dollar, euro, pound sterling and yen. Chinese officials, who wished to remain anonymous, told Bloomberg, that Beijing is already preparing a "declaration of victory", as obtained in the course of the meeting the signals from the IMF were unambiguous. And, because a few months ago, the yuan was given there to the IMF, on the topic "the gate turn", and suddenly (!) - A rapid reversal ... Magic is not differently. Do not "British" right? Thus, in the case of a positive decision on the yuan at a meeting of the IMF in November, the Chinese currency may obtain the status of the global "reserve" in October g of 2016. That's why, apparently, the Chinese leader in London and then went to - it's not there any contracts "on small things" in the tens of billions to save negligent governments. It is - as the world's reserve currency for the yuan! In Beijing, in fact, aware of, who and which makes decisions on issues related to global finance:
And with regard to the British Drang nach Osten, - it is successful attempts Monarchy get their place in the Pacific sun rising. "East Is Red" - once sang this song in China. And the song came back:
youtu.be/LzMKnPtmszc Today glow rising from the East, not notice the only one who looks the other way - to the West ... Reference
|
Свежие комментарии